Currículo

Instituições Políticas Comparadas 03427

Contextos

Groupo: Escola de Sociologia e Políticas Públicas > Optativas > Departamento de Ciência Política e Políticas Públicas > 2º Ciclo

ECTS

6.0 (para cálculo da média)

Objectivos

- Compreender o que são instituições políticas e porque é que elas importam; - Identificar as principais teorias sobre o papel, as características, e o impacto das instituições políticas em contextos não democráticos, nomeadamente os parlamentos, as eleições, e os partidos únicos/dominantes; - Identificar as principais teorias sobre instituições em regimes democráticos, nomeadamente sobre sistemas de governo, relações executivo-legislativo, governos e instituições informais - Desenvolver uma visão comparada das instituições políticas em diferentes contextos e tipos de regimes

Programa

1. Instituições Políticas Comparadas: uma introdução 2. Autocracias e Instituições Políticas: modo de funcionamento, benefícios e riscos 3. Instituições Políticas e Democratização: evidências sobre o seu impacto 4. Instituições Políticas em Democracia: tipos de democracia, impacto das instituições

Método de Avaliação

Avaliação ao longo do semestre (requer assiduidade mínima de 2/3 aulas): Discussão de um texto: 20% - exercício individual, será avaliada a capacidade de análise e compreensão de um texto indicado pela professora a discutir na segunda parte de uma aula teórico-prática (exclusivamente oral) Apresentação oral: 20% - exercício em grupo (2), será avaliada a capacidade de análise e exposição de um texto indicado pela professora a apresentar na segunda parte de uma aula teórico-prática (oral e escrito - formato PPT) Comentário: 10% - exercício individual, será avaliada a capacidade de produzir uma apreciação crítica sobre a apresentação oral de colegas (exclusivamente oral) Ensaio escrito: 50% - exercício individual, será avaliada a capacidade de recolher bibliografia autonomamente, estruturar um texto com princípio, meio e fim, articular ideias e sintetizar os principais contributos dos trabalhos analisados (20% da nota será para a proposta escrita do ensaio + a sua exposição oral no último dia de aulas, os restantes 30% para o trabalho em si, a entregar em data a definir em reunião de conselho de turma) Em alternativa, avaliação por exame: prova escrita (100%).

Carga Horária

Carga Horária de Contacto -

Trabalho Autónomo - 129.0

Carga Total -

Bibliografia

Principal

  • Samuels, D. and M. Shugart (2010), Presidents, Parties and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior, New York: Cambridge University Press Rhodes, R., Blinder, S. and Rockman, B. (2007), Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Przeworski, A., M. Alvarez, J. A. Cheibub, and F. Limongi, (2000), Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950?1990, New York: Cambridge University Press. Pasquino, G. (2010), Curso de CIência Política, Cascais: Principia. Gandhi, J. and Ruíz-Rufino, R. (2014), Routledge Handbook of Comparative Political Institutions, Routledge. Della Porta, D. (2003), Introdução à Ciência Política, Lisboa. Editorial Estampa. Cheibub, J. A., (2007), Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press. Acemoglu, D. and J. Robinson (2006), Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press. :

Secundária

  • Wantchekon, L. (2003), 'Clientelism and voting behavior: Evidence from the field experiment in Benin', World Politics, 55(3), pp. 399-422. Tsai, L. (2007), 'Solidarity groups, informal accountability, and local public goods provision in rural China', American Political Science Review, 101(2), pp. 355-72. Svolik, M.W. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Strom, K., W. Muller and D. M. Smith (2010), ?Parliamentary Control of Coalition Governments?, Annual Review of Political Science, 13, pp.517?535 Schmidt, M. (2005), Political Institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sanches, E. (2018), Party systems in young democracies: varieties of institutionalization, London: Routledge. Przeworski, A. (2004), ?Institutions Matter?? Government and Opposition, 39 (4), pp. 527?540. Pinto, A.C. (2016), ?Corporatism and organic representation in European dictatorships', in A.C. Pinto (eds.) Corporatism and Fascism: the corporatist wave in Europe, London: Routledge. Opalo, K. (2014), ?The long road to institutionalization: the Kenyan parliament and the 2013 elections?, Journal of Eastern African Elections, 8(1), pp. 63-77 Norris, P. (2016), ?Electoral Integrity in East Asia?, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 12(1), pp. 1-25. Malesky, E., Schuler, P. (2010), Nodding or needling: Analyzing delegate responsiveness in an authoritarian parliament. American Political Science Review, 104, pp. 482-502. Lindberg, S. (2010), ?What accountability pressures do MPs in Africa face and how do they respond? Evidence from Ghana?, Journal of Modern African Studies, 48(1), pp. 117-42. Kosterina, S. (2016), ?Why vote for a co-opted party? Endogenous Government power increases and control of opposition politicians in authoritarian regimes?, Comparative Politics Studies, Knutsen, C.H, J. Moller and Skanning, S.E. (2016), ?Going historical: measuring democraticness before the age of mass democracy?, International Political Science Review, 37(5), pp. 679-89. Kim, W., Gandhi, J. (2010), Coopting workers under dictatorship. Journal of Politics, 72, pp. 646-658. Keefer, Philip (2007), 'Clientelism, credibility, and the policy choices of young democracies', American journal of political science, 51(4), pp. 804-21. Judge, D. (2005), Political institutions in the United Kingdom, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Huber, J. and C. Shipan (2002), Deliberate Discretion, New York: Cambridge University Press. Hix, S. and A. Noury (2016), ?Government-opposition or left-right? The institutional determinants of voting in legislatures?, Political Science Research and Methods, 4(2), pp. 249-73. Helmke, G. And Levitsky, S. (eds.) (2006), Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press Hartlyn, J., J. McCoy, and T. M. Mustillo (2008), ?Electoral Governance Matters: Explaining the Quality of Elections in Contemporary Latin America.? Comparative Political Studies 41(1): 73-98. Grzymala-Busse, A. (2008), 'Beyond Clientelism', Comparative Political Studies, 41(4-5), pp. 638-73. Gehlbach, S., Sonin, K. And Svolik, M. (2016), 'Formal models of nondemocratic politics', Annual Review of Political Science, 19, pp. 565-84. Gandrud, C. (2015), ?Two sword lengths apart?, Journal of Peace Research, 53(1), pp. 130-45. Gandhi, J., A. Przeworski (2006), 'Cooperation, cooptation and rebellion under dictatorships'. Economics & Politics, 18, pp. 1-26. Fernandes, J. and P. Magalhães (2016), ?Government survival in semipresidential regimes?, European Journal of Political Research, 55(1), pp. 61-80. Elgie, R. (2003), Political Institutions in contemporary France, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Elgie, R. (1999), Semi-Presidentialism in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Eisenstadt, T. A. (2007), Courting democracy in Mexico: Party strategies and electoral institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press Donno, D. (2013). Elections and democratization in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 57, pp. 703-716. Cotta, M. and L. Verzichelli (2007), Political institutions in Italy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Colomer, J. (eds.) (2008), Comparative European Politics, New York: Routledge. Chen, J., J. Pan and Y. Xu (2016), ?Sources of authoritarian responsiveness: a field experiment in China?, American Journal of Political Science, 60(2), pp. 383-400. Cheeseman, N. (2016), ?Patrons, parties, political linkage, and the birth of competitive-authoritarianism in Africa?, African Studies Review, 59(3), pp. 181-200. Chaisty, P., N. Cheeseman, and T. Power (2014), ?Rethinking the ?presidentialism debate: conceptualizing coalitional politics in cross-regional perspective, Democratization, 27(1), pp. 72-94 Boix, C., and M. Svolik (2013), ?The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships.? Journal of Politics 75(2): pp. 300?16. Birch, S. and C. van Ham (2017), ?Getting away with foul play? The importance of formal and informal oversight institutions for electoral integrity?, European Journal of Political Research, 56(3), pp. 487-511. Birch, S. (2008), ?Electoral Institutions and Popular Confidence in Electoral Processes: A Cross-National Analysis.? Electoral Studies 27(2), pp. 305-320. Amorim Neto, O. and Lobo, M.C. (2014), ?Semi-presidentialism in Lusophone countries: diffusion and operation?, Democratization, 21(3), pp. 434-57. Amorim Neto, O. And Strom, K. (2006), 'Breaking the parliamentary chain of delegation: Presidents and non-partisan cabinet members in European democracies', British Journal of Political Science, 36, pp. 619-43. Alejandro, B. and E. Simison (2017), ?Legislative Institutions and Performance in Authoritarian Regimes?, Comparative Politics, 49(4), pp. 521-44.:

Disciplinas de Execução

2024/2025 - 1º Semestre

2020/2021 - 1º Semestre

2021/2022 - 1º Semestre

2022/2023 - 1º Semestre

2023/2024 - 1º Semestre