Currículo
Política Industrial, de Inovação e de Investigação 03384
Contextos
Groupo: Economia Política, Doutoramento Interdisciplinar > 3º Ciclo > Parte Escolar > Optativas
Groupo: Economia Política, Doutoramento Interdisciplinar > 3º Ciclo > Parte Escolar > Optativas
ECTS
6.0 (para cálculo da média)
Objectivos
Nesta UC visa-se concretizar os seguintes objetivos de aprendizagem: 1) Dotar os alunos de instrumentos concetuais e procedimentais de aprendizagem sobre o papel do Estado nos domínios das políticas industrial, de inovação e de investigação. 2) Dotar os alunos de instrumentos de reflexão crítica sobre a diversidade de perspetivas acerca das orientações aos níveis das políticas industrial, de inovação e de investigação. 3) Desenvolver competências de análise aplicada de Economia Política através de casos específicos de medidas de política industrial, de inovação e de investigação.
Programa
1. Introdução a. Conceitos de III b. Relações entre ciência, tecnologia e inovação 2. Evolução das Políticas de III b. Evolução da política industrial a. Evolução das políticas de investigação e inovação c. Estudo de caso: a política de propriedade intelectual 3. Perspectivas comparadas a. O desempenho científico e tecnológico das nações b. Sistemas nacionais de inovação c. Estados desenvolvimentistas d. Estudos sociais da ciência e da tecnologia e. Estudo de caso: políticas de III em Portugal 4. Economia Política das Políticas de III a. A economia política da política industrial b. A economia política do Consenso de Washington c. A governação global da investigação e da inovação d. Estudo de caso: os laboratório associados em Portugal 5. Prospectiva e grandes desafios das políticas de III
Método de Avaliação
Ensaio individual: 100% Exame final: 100%
Carga Horária
Carga Horária de Contacto -
Trabalho Autónomo - 121.0
Carga Total -
Bibliografia
Principal
- Stubbs (2009). What ever happened to the East Asian Developmental State? The unfolding debate. The Pacific Review, 22(1), 1-22. Schot & Steinmueller (2018), 'Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change?, Research Policy, 47(9): 1554-1567. Lundvall (2007). National innovation systems?analytical concept and development tool. Industry and innovation, 14(1), 95-119. Confraria et al. (2017). Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North. Research Policy, 46, 265?279 Chang (1994). State, institutions and structural change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5(2), 293-313. Boldrin & Levine (2013). The Case Against Patents. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 3-22. Andreoni & Chang (2019). The political economy of industrial policy: Structural interdependencies, policy alignment and conflict management. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 48, 136-150.:
Secundária
- Veloso, L. e Carmo, R.M. (eds.) (2011). As estruturas sociais da economia. Lisboa: Mundos Sociais. Shinn, T. (2008). Instrumentation Between Science, State and Industry. Research-Technology and Cultural Change: Instrumentation, Genericity, Transversality. Oxford: The Bardwell Press. Shinn, T. (2002). ?The triple helix and new production of knowledge: prepackaged thinking on science and technology?. Social Studies of Science, 32(4), pp. 599-614. Shapin, S. (2008). The Scientific Life. A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Salavisa, I. (coord.) (2007). Casos de Sucesso em I&D: Networking e Transferência de Conhecimento. Lisboa: Edição IESE. Rodrigues, M.L; Heitor, M. (2015). 40 Anos de Políticas de Ciência e de Ensino Superior. Coimbra: Almedina Ribeiro, F.; Peleteiro, M.C. & Silva, G. (2007). Economia do conhecimento e entidades do sistema científico e tecnológico. Porto: SPI. Radosevic, S. & Yoruk, E. (2014). ?Are there global shifts in the world science base? Analysing the catching up and falling behind of world regions?. Scientometrics101 (3), 1897?1924. Polanyi, M. (1962). ?The republic of science: its political and economic theory?, Minerva, 1:54-74. Pinto, H.; Santos Pereira, T. (2013). ?Efficiency of innovation systems in Europe: an institutional approach to the diversity of national profiles?, European Planning Studies, 21(6). Pinto, H. (2013). ?Knowledge transfer and the ?academic enterprise? in the Algarve: contributions from social studies of science and technology to the understanding of university-firm relations?. Spatial and Organizational Dynamics Discussion Papers, 12. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D?Este, P., Fini, R.,Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F.,Salter, A. & Sobrero, M. (2013). ?Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university?industry relations?. Research Policy 42,423?442. Patrício, T. e Conceição, Cristina P.(orgs.) (2015). Redes e colaborações científicas. Lisboa: Mundos Sociais. Ornston, D., & Vail, M. I. (2016). ?The Developmental State in Developed Societies: Power, Partnership, and Divergent Patterns of Intervention in France and Finland?. Comparative Politics, 49(1), 1-21. Oliveira, L. (2008). Sociologia da inovação: a construção social das técnicas e dos mercados. Oeiras: Celta. Nelson, R.R. (2005). ?The roles of research in universities and public labs in economic catch-up?. In Santangelo, G. (Org.), Technological Change and Economic Catch-Up. Edward Elgar Publishing. Mazzucato, M. (2013). The Entrepreneurial State. Debunking Public Vs. Private Myths In Innovation. Londres: Anthem Press. Mamede, R.P.; Godinho, M.M. & Simões, V.C. (2014). ?Assessment and challenges of industrial policies in Portugal: is there a way out of the ?stuck in the middle? trap??. In A. Teixeira, E. Silva e R. Mamede (Orgs.), Structural Change, Competitiveness and Industrial Policy: Painful Lessons from the European Periphery. London: Routledge. Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). ?National innovation systems?analytical concept and development tool?. Industry and innovation, 14(1), 95-119. Lissoni, F. (2013). ?Academic patenting in Europe: a reassessment of evidence and research practices?. Industry and Innovation. 20, 379?384. Leftwich, A. (1995). ?Bringing politics back in: towards a model of the developmental state?. Journal of Development Studies, 31(3), 400-427. Law, J. (1987). ?Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: the case of Portuguese Expansion?, The Social construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 111-134. Latour, B. (2004). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Harvard University Press: Cambridge. King, D.A. (2004). ?The scientific impact of nations?. Nature 430 (6997), 311?316. Jasanoff, S. et. al. (1995). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge: MIT PRESS. Godinho, M.M. (2007). ?Indicadores de C&T, Inovação e Conhecimento: Onde Estamos? Para Onde Vamos??, Análise Social XLII (182), pp. 239-274. Godinho, M.M. & Mamede, R.P. (2016). ?Southern Europe in crisis: industrial policy les-sons from Italy and Portugal?. Economia e Politica Industriale/ Journal of Industri-al and Business Economics 43(3), pp.331-336. Magalhães (orgs.), Encontro de Saberes: Três Gerações de Bolseiros da Gulbenkian. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian (273-286). Godinho, M. M. (2006). ?Os Limites da Privatização da Ciência?. In Ana Tostões, E. Arantes Oliveira, J. M. Pinto Paixão e Pedro Kentikelenis et al.(2016) IMF conditionality and development policy space, 1985?2014, Review of International Political Economy, 23:4, 543-582 Godin, B. & Lane, J.P. (2012). ?A century of talks on research: what happened to development and production??. International Journal Transitions and Innovation Systems, 2 (1): 5-13. Gibbons, M.; Limoges, C.; Nowotny, H.; Schwartzman, S.; Scott, P. & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage. Gaspar, J.; Gago, M.M., Simões, A. (2009). ?Scientific life under the Portuguese dictatorial regime (1929-1954): the communities of geneticists and physicists?. Journal of History of Science and Technology, 3. Fine, B.; Saraswati, J. & Tavasic, D. (Orgs.) (2013), Beyond the developmental state: Industrial policy into the 21st century. Londres: Pluto. Fernandes, J. (2007). A responsabilidade social na comunicação da ciência nos laboratórios de Estado portugueses. Dissertação de doutoramento em Ciências da Comunicação. FCSH-UNL. Fagerberg, J. et. al. (2004). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fagerberg, J. (2017). ?Innovation Policy: Rationales, Lessons and Challenges?. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(2), 497-512. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff , L. (2000). ?The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ?Mode 2? to a Triple Helix of university?industry?government relations?, Research Policy, 29, pp. 109-123. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorf, L. (eds.). (1997). Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy. A Triple-Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. London and Washington: Pinter Publishers. Confraria, H.; Wang, L. & Godinho, M.M. (2017). ?Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North?. Research Policy (46) 1, 265-279. Chan, S., Lutz, H., Lam, D., & Clark, C. (Eds.). (2016). Beyond the developmental state: East Asia?s political economies reconsidered. Springer. Cartaxo, R. & Godinho, M. (2017). ?How institutional nature and available resources determine the performance of Technology Transfer Offices?. Industry and Innovation (publicado online em janeiro 2017). Caraça, J., Lundvall, B. Å., & Mendonça, S. (2009). The changing role of science in the innovation process: From Queen to Cinderella?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 861-867. Callon, M. (1986). ?The Sociology of an Actor-Network: the Case of the Electric Vehicle?, In Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, Sociology of Science in the Real World, MacMillan Press, London, p. 358-376. Breznitz, D., & Ornston, D. (2016). ?The politics of partial success: fostering innovation in innovation policy in an era of heightened public scrutiny?. Socio-Economic Re-view, mww018 Bijker, W. et. al. (1987) (eds.). The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge (Mass.). MIT Press. Bijker, W. E.; Law, J. (eds.) (1992). Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. USA: MIT Press. Bijker, W. E. (ed.) (2007). Structures of Scientific Collaboration Inside Technology. Cambridge. Massachusetts, London: The MIT Press. Arqué-Castells, P.; Cartaxo, R.M.; García-Quevedo, J.; Godinho, M.M. (2016). ?Royalty sharing, effort and invention in universities: Evidence from Portugal and Spain?. Research Policy 45, 1858?1872: