Currículo

Metodologias de Avaliação L5145

Contextos

Groupo: SOC - 2009 > 1º Ciclo > Optativas > Livre - 3.º Ano, 1.º Semestre

Groupo: SOC - 2009 > 1º Ciclo > Optativas > Livre - 3.º Ano, 2.º Semestre

Groupo: SOC - 2009 > 1º Ciclo > Políticas Públicas

ECTS

6.0 (para cálculo da média)

Objectivos

A disciplina de Metodologias de Avaliação tem os seguintes objectivos de aprendizagem:(i) Compreensão da especificidade da avaliação no contexto do ciclo das políticas públicas, bem como dos seus principais objetivos e domínios de intervenção; (ii)aquisição de conhecimentos sobre os principais métodos de suporte ao desenho e análise das distintas componentes dos exercícios de avaliação; (iii)desenvolvimento da capacidade de conceber processos de avaliação em diferentes áreas de intervenção.

Programa

1. INTRODUÇÃO À AVALIAÇÃO DE POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS 1.1. Ciências sociais e avaliação 1.2. Objecto e objectivo da avaliação 1.3. Tipos genéricos de avaliação 1.4. Conceitos relevantes 1.5. A avaliação no ciclo de programação de políticas públicas 2. MÉTODOS DE SUPORTE AO DESENHO E PLANEAMENTO EM AVALIAÇÃO 2.1. As questões de avaliação 2.2. As principais dimensões de avaliação 2.3. Instrumentos e técnicas em avaliação 2.4. Exemplos de abordagens metodológicas 3. DESAFIOS À PRÁTICA DA AVALIAÇÃO DE POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS 3.1. Elementos de valorização da avaliação 3.2. Bloqueios e dificuldades da avaliação 3.3. A interferência política no processo de avaliação 3.4. Comunicação e discussão de resultados

Método de Avaliação

Em termos de avaliação a disciplina Metodologias de Avaliação recorre à elaboração de dois trabalhos práticos. A nota final será obtida com recurso à seguinte ponderação: - Primeiro Trabalho (individual) - 60% da nota final; - Segundo Trabalho (em grupo) - 40% da nota final. Para aprovação é necessário ter um mínimo de 75% de assiduidade às aulas.

Carga Horária

Carga Horária de Contacto -

Trabalho Autónomo - 113.0

Carga Total -

Bibliografia

Principal

Bamberger, M. & Mabry, L. (2020). RealWorld evaluation. Working under budget, time, data and political constrains. (3th. Ed.). London: Sage. Rossi, P., Lipsey, M. & Henry, G. (2019). Evaluation: a systematic approach. (8th. Ed.). London: Sage. Patton, M. (2018). Facilitating evaluation: principles in practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Fox, C., Grimm, R. & Caldeira, R. (2017). An introduction to evaluation. London: Sage. Chen, H. (2015). Practical program evaluation: theory-driven evaluation and the integrated evaluation perspective. (2nd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. :

Secundária

Wholey, J., Harty, H. & Newcomer, K. (eds.) (2015). Handbook of practical program evaluation. (4th. Ed.). Washington: Jossey-Bass. White, H. & Raitzer, D. (2017). Impact evaluation of development interventions. Manila: Asian Development Bank. Westhorp, G. (2014). Realist impact evaluation: an introduction. London: Overseas Development Institute. Wauters, B. (2018). Process tracing and congruence analysis to support theory-based impact evaluation. In Evaluation, 24(3), pp. 284-305. Trevisan, M. & Walser, T. (2015). Evaluation assessment: improving evaluation quality and use. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Torralbo, R. & Roldán, S. (2019). A evaluación de políticas públicas con enfoque de género. Sevilla: Instituto Andaluz de Administración Pública. Stufflebeam, D. & Shinfield, A. (2014). Evaluation theory, models and applications. (2nd. Ed.). London: Wiley and Sons. Stockmann, R. & Meyer, W. (eds.) (2016). The future of evaluation: global trends, new challenges, shared perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Shah, A. (2020). Policy, program and project evaluation: a toolkit for economic analysis in a changing world. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Scupola, A. (2019). Digital transformation of public administration services in Denmark: a process tracing case study. In Journal of NBICT, Vol. 1, 261-284. Schmid, C., Stijnen, T. & White, I. (eds.) (2021). Handbook of meta-analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Saunders, R. (2016). Implementation monitoring and process evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Ruiz, C. (2016). Guía para el diseño, gestión y utilización de evaluaciones de programas y políticas públicas. Documento de Trabajo nº 45. Madrid: Programa EUROsociAL. Ruiz, A. (coord.) (2015). Guía práctica para el diseño y la realización de evaluaciones de políticas públicas. Madrid: Agencia Estatal de Evaluación de las Políticas Públicas y la Calidad de los Servicios. Rubin, A. (2020). Pragmatic program evaluation for social work: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rico, J. (2020). Guía de evaluación de resultados de políticas públicas. Madrid: Ministerio de Política Territorial y Función Pública. Preskill, H. & Russ-Eft, D. (2016). Building evaluation capacity. (2nd. Ed.) London: Sage. Posavac, E. & Linfield, K. (2018). Program evaluation: methods and case studies. (9th. Ed.). London. Routledge. Perret, B. (2016). L?evaluation des politiques publiques. Paris: La Découverte. Peck, L. (2019). Experimental evaluation design for program improvement (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Patton, M., McKegg, K & Wehipeihana, N. (2016). Developmental evaluation exemplars. New York: The Guilford Press. Patton, M. (2017). Principles-focused evaluation: the guide. New York: The Guilford Press. Pasanen, T. & Shaxson, L. (2016). How to design a monitoring and evaluation framework for a policy research project. London: Methods Lab. Padia, E. (2019). Bases para la evaluación de impacto de políticas públicas. Sevilla: Instituto Andaluz de Administración Pública. OECD/DAC (2019). Better criteria for better evaluation. Revised evaluation criteria definitions and principles for use. Paris: OECD DAC Network on Development Evaluation. Nkwake, A. (2020). Working with assumptions in international development program evaluation. (2nd. Ed.). Cham: Springer Nature. Nkwake, A. (2015). Credibility, validity, and assumptions in program evaluation methodology. Cham: Springer. Monteros, J. (2017). Guía de evaluación ex ante de políticas públicas. Sevilla: Instituto Andaluz de Administración Pública. Mertens, D. (2018). Mixed Methods design in evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Mertens, D. & Wilson, A. (2018). Program evaluation theory and practice: a comprehensive guide. (2nd. En.) New York: The Guilford Press. McKegg, K., Patton, M. & Wehipeihana, N. (2016). Developmental evaluation exemplars: principles in practice. New York: The Guilford Press. Mcdavid, J., Huse, I. & Hawyhorn, L (2019). Program evaluation and performance measurement. An introduction to practice. (3th. Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Markiewicz, A. & Patrick, I. (2015). Developing monitoring and evaluation frameworks. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Kenneth J. & Posavac, E. (2018). Program evaluation: methods and case studies. (9th. Ed.). London: Routledge. Josselin, J. & Maux, B. (2017). Statistical tools for program evaluation methods and applications to economic policy, public health, and education. Cham: Springer. HM Treasury (2020). Magenta book: guidance for evaluation. London: Crown Copyright. HM Treasury (2018). The green book central government guidance on appraisal and evaluation. London: Crown Copyright. Hardy, A., Preiser, W. & Schramm, U. (2017). Building performance evaluation: from delivery process to life cycle phases. (2nd. Ed.). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Grinnell, R., Gabor, P. & Unrau, Y. (2019). Program evaluation for social workers: foundations of evidence-based programs. (8th. Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Grinnell, R. & Unrau, Y. (2018). Social work research and evaluation. (7th. Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gertler, P., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. & Vermeersch, C. (2018). Avaliação de Impacto na Prática. (2th. Ed.) Washington: World Bank Publications. Fröhlich, M. &; Sperlich, S. (2019). Impact evaluation, treatment effects and causal analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fink, A. (2015). Evaluation fundamentals: insights into program effectiveness, quality and value. (3th. Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Ferrão, J. & Paixão, J. (eds.) (2018). Metodologias de avaliação de políticas públicas. Lisboa: Imprensa da Universidade de Lisboa. European Commission (2020). How to use administrative data for European Social Funds counterfactual impact evaluations. A step-by-step guide for managing authorities. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. European Commission (2019). Advanced counterfactual evaluation methods: Guidance document. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. European Commission (2018). Programming period 2014-2020: Monitoring and evaluation of European Cohesion Policy. August 2018. European Commission. Duffy, D. (2017). Evaluation and governing in the 21st century: disciplinary measures, transformative possibilities. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Donaldson, S., Christie, C. & Mark, M. (2015). Credible and actionable evidence: the foundation for rigorous and influential evaluations. (2nd. Ed.) Thousand Oaks: Sage. Desplatz, R. (2019). L?évaluation des politiques publiques eaux États-Unis. Document de travail n.º 12. France Stratégie. Desplatz, R. & Lacouette-Fougère, C. (2019). L?évaluation des politiques publiques en France. Document de travail n.º 13. France Stratégie. Desplatz, R. & Ferracci, M. (2016). Comment évaluer l?impactdes politiques publiques? Un guide à l?usagedes décideurs et praticiens. France Stratégie. Debu, S. (2019). L?évaluation des politiques publiques au Royaume-Uni. Document de travail n.º 14. France Stratégie. Cousins, J. (2019). Collaborative approaches to evaluation: principles in use. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Chyung, S. (2018). 10-Step Evaluation for Training and Performance Improvement. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Chouinard, J. & Cram, F. (2019). Culturally responsive approaches to evaluation: empirical implications for theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Chiappini, H. (2017). Social impact funds: definition, assessment and performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Chan, K., Nguyen, T. & Tran, T. (2018). Developing cross-cultural measurement in social work research and evaluation. (2nd. Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Casillas, C., Macía, M. & Rico, J. (2020). Guía de evaluación de diseño de políticas públicas. Madrid: Ministerio de Política Territorial y Función Pública. Casillas, C., García, L., Lago, E. & Macía, M. (2020). Guía de evaluación de implementación de políticas públicas. Madrid: Ministerio de Política Territorial y Función Pública. Casillas, C., García, L. & Macía, M. (2020). Guía de evaluabilidad de intervenciones públicas. Madrid: Ministerio de Política Territorial y Función Pública. Byrne, D. (2016). Qualitative comparative analysis: a pragmatic method for evaluating intervention. Surrey: Centre for the Evaluation Complexity Across the Nexus. Burch, P. & Heinrich, C. (2016). Mixed Methods for policy research and program evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Bono, P. (et. al.) (2018). Vingt ans d?évaluations d?impacten France et à l?étranger. Document de travail n.º 6. France Stratégie. Befani, B. (2016). Pathways to change: Evaluating development interventions with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Report for the Expert Group for Aid Studies, Report 05/16. Stockholm: EBA. Barrett, N. (2016). Program evaluation: a step-by-step guide. Springfield: Sunnycrest Press. Bakken, L. (2018). Evaluation practice for collaborative growth: a guide to program evaluation with stakeholders and communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Baiz, A. (et. al.) (2019). Vingt ans d?évaluationsd?impact en France et à l?étranger: Analyse comparéedes pratiques dans six pays. Document de travail n.º 16. France Stratégie. Altschuld, J. & Engle, M. (eds.) (2015). Accreditation, certification, and credentialing: relevant concerns for U.S. evaluators. Danvers: Wiley Periodicals. Alegre, M., Farré, M., Sabes-Figuera, R. & Todeschini, F. (2017). Guia pràctica d?avaluació de programes del tercer sector social. Barcelona: Ivàlua. :