Currículo

Media e Participação Política 01729

Contextos

ECTS

6.0 (para cálculo da média)

Objectivos

OA1: Compreender conceitos essenciais na análise política na era digital OA2: Assimilar um conhecimento básico dos processos e momentos chaves da digitalização da política OA3: Identificar e analisar os principais desafios, oportunidades e riscos da digitalização da política e da esfera pública OA4: Avaliar as implicações do desenvolvimento da IA na política OA5: Analisar os processos de regulamentação e de governança do digital e da IA a nível nacional e supranacional OA6: Explorar e aplicar diferentes metodologias de estudo da política na era digital. OA7: Desenvolver um olhar crítico e rigoroso para com os processos digitais que envolvem a política na contemporaneidade.

Programa

1. 'Participação política', instituições e governança 2. e-participação, e-governança e e-democracia 3. 'Ativismo digital' 4. 'Policing protest na era digital' (novas tecnologias no controle policial do conflito e da ordem pública) 5. ‘Partidos digitais e populismo’ 6. ‘O desenho digital da democracia e da participação’ 7. 'Cidadania digital e democracia digital' (Esfera pública e esfera pública digital) 8. ‘O impato da IA na política e as políticas de regulamentação da IA’ 9. ‘A fruição e produção de conteúdos políticos digitais e as potenciais desigualdades’ 10. Estudar a participação política na era digital

Método de Avaliação

AVALIAO AO LONGO DO SEMESTRE - Cada semana um ou mais grupos de estudantes apresentam um trabalho que pode ser: um pequeno projeto de rede social de um movimento social ou outro ator político; uma chamada de manifestação online; criação/invenção de um grupo ativista online ou de um novo partido; uma breve etnografia digital, discussão crítica de um texto, análise de um evento, etc. (40% da nota final) - Na última aula é realizado um trabalho escrito. Os alunos podem escolher entre duas modalidades: teste sobre a matéria tratada durante as aulas ou breve ensaio sobre um tópico específico. Neste último caso os estudantes devem referir pelos menos 3 textos que constam da bibliografia (o tópico do breve ensaio é sugerido pela professora). (60% da nota final) AVALIAÇÃO POR EXAME (1ª época, 2ª época, época especial) Ensaio sobre mínimo 6 leituras da bibliografia: 100% da nota final. Para aprovação numa unidade curricular, o estudante deve obter uma classificação final mínima de 10 valores

Carga Horária

Bibliografia

Principal

• Beissinger, M. 2017 'Conventional and 'Virtual Civil Societies in Autocratic Regimes, Comparative Politics 49(3): 351-371 Casteltrione, I. and M. Pieczka. 2019. 'Mediating the contributions of Facebook to political participation in Italy and the UK', Palgrave Communications 4(1): 56-56 Chiarini and S. Evans. 2019. 'Empowering political participation through artificial intelligence', Science and Public Policy 46(3): 369-380 Dalton, R, and H. Klingemann. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, Oxford: OUP Edwards, Lilian. 2022. The EU AI Act: a summary of its significance and scope, Disponível online Hennen, L. et al. 2020. European E-Democracy in Practice, NYC: Springer. McIlwain, C. 2020. Black Software. The Internet & Racial Justice, from the AfroNet to Black Lives Matter. Oxford: Oxford University Press Teocharis, Y., et al 2019. 'Digitally Networked Participation and Lifestyle Politics as New Modes of Political Participation', Policy and Internet 13(1): 30-53:

Secundária

• Accornero Guya and Pedro Ramos Pinto. 2015. '"Mild Mannered?" Protest and Mobilisation in Portugal under Austerity, 2010-2013'. West European Politics 38 (3): 491-515. Accornero, G. 2017. ‘The Mediation of the Portuguese Anti-Austerity Protest Cycle. Media Coverage and its Impact’, in Media Representations of Anti-Austerity Protests in the EU: Grievances, Identities and Agency, ed. by Tao Papaioannou and Suman Gupta. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 165-188 Accornero, Guya, and O. Fillieule. 2016. ‘So many as the stars of the sky in multitude, and as the sand which is by the sea shore innumerable’, in Social Movement Studies in Europe. The State of the Art, ed. by Olivier Fillieule and Guya Accornero. Oxford/New York, Berghahn, pp. 1-18 Adut, A. 2012. A Theory of the Public Sphere, Sociological Theory 30(4) 238262 Bosi, L. and L. Zamponi. 2015. ‘Direct Social Actions And Economic Crises. The Relationship Between Forms Of Action And Socio- Economic Context In Italy’, Partecipazione e Conflitto 8(2): 367-391. Brooker, P. et al. 2018. ‘Researching with Twitter timeline data: A demonstration via everyday sociopolitical talk around welfare provision’, Big Data & Society 113 Cardoso, G. et al. 2017. ‘Social Movements, participation and crisis in Europe’, in Europe’s crisis, ed. by Manuel Castells, Olivier Bouin, Joao Caraca, Gustavo Cardoso, John Thompson and Michel Wieviorka. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 405-427 Choi, M. 2016. ‘A Concept Analysis of Digital Citizenship for Democratic Citizenship Education in the Internet Age’, Theory & Research in Social Education 44(4): 565-607. Colebatch, H.K. 2014. ‘Making Sense of Governance’, Policy and Society 33(4): 307-316 De Blasio, E. and M. Sorice. 2018. ‘Populism between direct democracy and the technological myth’, Palgrave Communication 4(15): 1-11. Della Porta, D. 2015. Social movements in times of austerity : bringing capitalism back into protest analysis, Hoboken: Wiley, chapter 4-5. Della Porta, D. and M. Diani. Social Movements. An Introduction. Hoboken: Wiley, pp. 93-121, pp. 164-191, pp. 194-218. Dencik, L., A. Hintz, and Z. Carey. 2018. ‘Prediction, pre-emption and limits to dissent: Social media and big data uses for policing protests in the United Kingdom’, New Media & Society 20 (4): 14331450 Dolata, U. and J.F. Schrape. 2016. ‘Masses, Crowds, Communities, Movements: Collective Action in the Internet Age’, Social Movement Studies 15(1): 1-18 Earl, J. and Kimport, K. 2013. Digitally Enabled Social Change. Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT, Intro and chater 2. Fillieule, O. 2015. ‘Demobilization and Disengagement in a Life Course Perspective’, in The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, Oxford, Oxford University Press: 277-288. Gerbaudo, P. 2017. ‘The indignant citizen: anti-austerity movements in southern Europe and the anti-oligarchic reclaiming of citizenship’, Social Movement Studies 16(1): 36-50 Gerbaudo, P. 2018. ‘Social media and populism: an elective affinity’, Media, Culture & Society 40(5): 745-753. Govil, N. and A.K. Baishya. 2018. ‘The Bully in the Pulpit: Autocracy, Digital Social Media, and Right-wing Populist Technoculture’, Communication Culture & Critique 11: 67-84. Habermas, J. 1995. ‘Três modelos normativos de democracia’, Lua Nova 36: 39-53. Hale, S.A et. al. 2018. ‘How digital design shapes political participation: A natural experiment with social information’, PLoS ONE 13(4): e0196068. Halupka, M. 2016. ‘Dont knock clicktivism: it represents the political participation aspirations of the modern citizen, DemocraticAudit; and Clicktivism: A Systematic Heuristic’, Policy and Internet 6(2): 115-132 Hupe, P. and A. Edwards, 2012. ‘The accountability of power: Democracy and governance in modern times’, European Political Science Review 4(2): 177194 Jasper, James, and Jan Duyvendak. 2015. Breaking Down the State. Protestors Engaged with Authorities. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, chapters Introduction and 4. Joyce, M. ed. 2010. Digital Activism Decoded. The New Mechanics of Change. NYC: International Debate Education Association. Kaase, M. 2007. ‘Perspectives on Political Participation’, in The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by Russell J. Dalton and Hans Dieter Klingemann. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Klein, A. 2015. ‘Vigilante Media: Unveiling Anonymous and the Hacktivist Persona in the Global Press’, Communication Monographs 82(3): 379-401. Koopmans, R. 2007. ‘Social Movements’, in The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by R. J. Dalton and H.D. Klingemann. Oxford: OUP. Kriesi, Hanspeter and Takkis Papas. 2015. Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession, Colchester: ECPR Press (chap. 10-11) Lane, J. 2016. ‘The Digital Street: An Ethnographic Study of Networked Street Life in Harlem’, American Behavioral Scientist 60(1) 43 58 Lindquist, E. and I. Huse, 2017. ‘Accountability and monitoring government in the digital era: Promise, realism and research for digital-era governance’, Canadian Public Administration 60(4): 627-656. Luhtakallio, E. and N. Eliasoph. 2014. ‘Ethnography of Politics and Political Communication: Studies in Sociology and Political Science’, The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication, Edited by Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson, pp. 1-11. McDonald, K. 2015. ‘From Indymedia to Anonymous: rethinking action and identity in digital cultures’, Information, Communication & Society 18(8): 968-928. Parvin, P. 2018. ‘Democracy Without Participation: A New Politics for a Disengaged Era’, Res Publica 24: 31-52 Pink, S. et al. 2016. Digital Ethnography. Principles and Preactice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Poell, T. 2019. ‘Social media, temporality, and the legitimacy of protest’, Social Movement Studies, DOI: 10.1080/14742837.2019.1605287 Sassen, S. 1996. Losing Control Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization, Intro of Losing Control: Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization, NYC: Columbia University Press. Savaget, P., T. Chiarini and S. Evans. 2019. ‘Empowering political participation through artificial intelligence’, Science and Public Policy 46(3): 369380 Schäfer, M. 2015. ‘Digital Public Sphere’, in Mazzoleni, Gianpietro et al. (2015, Eds.): The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication. London: Wiley Blackwell. Pp. 322-328. Schroeder, R. 2018. ‘Digital media and the rise of right-wing populism’, in Social Theory after the Internet. Media, Technology, and Globalization. London: UCL Press, pp. 60-81 (full book available here: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10040801/1/Social-Theory- after-the-Internet.pdf) Tarrow, S. 2011. Power in Movement. Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1-29; pp. 196-2014 Torcal, M. 2014. ‘The Decline of Political Trust in Spain and Portugal: Economic Performance or Political Responsiveness’, American Behavioral Scientist 58(12): 1542-1567 Trmayne, M. 2014. ‘Anatomy of Protest in the Digital Era: A Network Analysis of Twitter and Occupy Wall Street’, Social Movement Studies 13(1): 110-126. Vicari, S. 2013. ‘Public reasoning around social contention: A case study of Twitter use in the Italian mobilization for global change’, Current Sociology 61(4) 474490 Waisbord, S. and A. Amado. 2017. ‘Populist communication by digital means: presidential Twitter in Latin America, Information’, Communication & Society 20(9): 1330-1346.:

Disciplinas de Execução

2023/2024 - 2º Semestre

2024/2025 - 2º Semestre