Ficha Unidade Curricular (FUC)
Informação Geral / General Information
Carga Horária / Course Load
Área científica / Scientific area
Políticas Públicas
Departamento / Department
Departamento de Ciência Política e Políticas Públicas
Ano letivo / Execution Year
2023/2024
Pré-requisitos / Pre-Requisites
Não se aplica
Objetivos Gerais / Objectives
O objeto da Unidade Curricular Desenho, Gestão e Avaliação de Políticas Públicas situa-se no espaço analítico que medeia as teorias gerais do estado e do processo do seu desenvolvimento histórico, por um lado, e as metodologias de planeamento, gestão e avaliação de políticas públicas, por outro lado. Esse é o espaço da transformação de orientações políticas de fundo em ação prática, em que se movem os aparelhos que planeiam e concebem os contornos operacionais das políticas, gerem a respetiva execução e procedem à sua avaliação. Visa-se, pois, com esta Unidade Curricular, proporcionar uma abordagem compreensiva ao modo como as políticas públicas são processadas, desde a ideia inicial até à lógica a que obedece a respetiva operacionalização, bem como a avaliação dos resultados e dos impactos que produzem.
Objetivos de Aprendizagem e a sua compatibilidade com o método de ensino (conhecimentos, aptidões e competências a desenvolver pelos estudantes) / Learning outcomes
- Aquisição de conhecimentos teóricos e metodológicos sobre a relação entre planeamento, avaliação e políticas públicas; - Aquisição de conhecimentos metodológicos e técnico-operativos sobre os métodos e conteúdos das principais fases de uma metodologia de planeamento de políticas públicas; - Aquisição de conhecimentos metodológicos e técnico-operativos sobre os principais procedimentos que devem acompanhar o desenho e execução de um exercício de avaliação.
Conteúdos Programáticos / Syllabus
1MÓDULO 1. CONCEPTUALIZAÇÃO E VISÃO SISTÉMICA 1.1. Operacionalização do conceito de políticas públicas 1.2. Abordagem sistémica 1.3. Teorias do programa 1.4. Teoria da mudança 1.5. Modelos lógicos 1.6. Ética MÓDULO 2. MARCO OPERACIONAL DO PLANEAMENTO 2.1. Diagnóstico e seleção de prioridades 2.2. Definição da estratégia 2.3. Plano de ação MÓDULO 3. MARCO OPERACIONAL DA AVALIAÇÃO 3.1. Conceitos, contextos e funções 3.2. Objeto, dimensões e questões de avaliação 3.3. Roteiros para o desenho de uma avaliação
Demonstração da coerência das metodologias de ensino e avaliação com os objetivos de aprendizagem da UC / Evidence that the teaching and assessment methodologies are appropriate for the learning outcomes
Os conteúdos programáticos percorrem um vetor que conduz das teorias gerais de enquadramento até à utilização prática avançada dos instrumentos de desenho, gestão e avaliação de políticas públicas, passando pelo desenvolvimento de competências metodológicas nos domínios do planeamento e da avaliação de políticas.
Avaliação / Assessment
A modalidade de avaliação contínua da UC consiste na realização de um trabalho em grupo e um relatório individual. A nota final será obtida com recurso à seguinte ponderação: - Trabalho de grupo: 70% da nota final; - Relatório individual: 30% da nota final. A UC não contempla prova escrita de Exame. Como alternativa a avaliação pode ser realizada por via de apresentação dos dois elementos previstos na modalidade de avaliação contínua apresentados unicamente a título individual. Estes elementos de avaliação terão que ser totalmente originais, não podendo ser sido, totalmente ou em parte, alvo de avaliação em momento prévio.
Metodologias de Ensino / Teaching methodologies
O processo de ensino-aprendizagem baseia-se numa abordagem que combina a provisão de elementos de reflexão teórica e metodológica com vista à aquisição de conhecimentos numa perspetiva crítica e à integração das diferentes matérias em campos problemáticos mais vastos, com o trabalho prático dos alunos, dirigido à apresentação de exemplos concretos de políticas públicas, dos mecanismos de tomada de decisão e dos procedimentos operativos de desenho, gestão e avaliação de políticas públicas.
Demonstração da coerência das metodologias de ensino e avaliação com os objetivos de aprendizagem da UC / Evidence that the teaching and assessment methodologies are appropriate for the learning outcomes
A metodologia de ensino promove a aquisição de conheciemtnos teóricos e metodológicos de enquadramento e ao mesmo tempo a experimentação prática dos procedimentos de desenho, gestão e avaliação de políticas públicas.
Observações / Observations
---
Bibliografia Principal / Main Bibliography
Capano, G., Howlett, M., Ramesh, M & Virani, A., (2019) “Making policies work: First- and second-order mechanisms in policy design”, Edward Elgar Publishing Chow, J., (2020)“Strategic policy design: a practitioner's guide to statecraft”, Routledge Dudley, J., (2020)“Social work evaluation: enhancing what we do”, Oxford University Press Grinnell, R., Gabor, P. & Unrau, Y., (2019)“Program evaluation for social workers: foundations of evidence-based programs”, Oxford University Press Peters, B. & Fontaine, G. (eds.), (2022)“Research handbook of policy design”, Edward Elgar. Rossi, P., Lipsey, M. & Henry, G. (2019). Evaluation: a systematic approach. (8th. Ed.). London: Sage. Rubin, A., (2020)“Pragmatic program evaluation for social work: an introduction”, Cambridge University Press
Bibliografia Secundária / Secondary Bibliography
"Avaliação de Políticas Públicas (programas sociais) Dudley, J. (2020). Social work evaluation: enhancing what we do. (3rd Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Grinnell, R. & Unrau, Y. (2018). Social work research and evaluation. (7th. Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Grinnell, R., Gabor, P. & Unrau, Y. (2019). Program evaluation for social workers: foundations of evidence-based programs. (8th. Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rubin, A. (2020). Pragmatic program evaluation for social work: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Unrau, Y. A., Gabor, P. A., & Grinnell, R. M. (2007). Evaluation in social work: The art and science of practice. (4th. Ed.). Oxford University Press. Avaliação de Políticas Públicas (em geral) Alegre, M., Farré, M., Sabes-Figuera, R. & Todeschini, F. (2017). Guia pràctica d?avaluació de programes del tercer sector social. Barcelona: Ivàlua. Altschuld, J. & Engle, M. (eds.) (2015). Accreditation, certification, and credentialing: relevant concerns for U.S. evaluators. Danvers: Wiley Periodicals. Baiz, A. (et. al.) (2019). Vingt ans d?évaluationsd?impact en France et à l?étranger: Analyse comparéedes pratiques dans six pays. Document de travail n.º 16. France Stratégie. Bakken, L. (2018). Evaluation practice for collaborative growth: a guide to program evaluation with stakeholders and communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Barrett, N. (2016). Program evaluation: a step-by-step guide. Springfield: Sunnycrest Press. Befani, B. (2016). Pathways to change: Evaluating development interventions with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Report for the Expert Group for Aid Studies, Report 05/16. Stockholm: EBA. Bono, P. (et. al.) (2018). Vingt ans d?évaluations d?impacten France et à l?étranger. Document de travail n.º 6. France Stratégie. Burch, P. & Heinrich, C. (2016). Mixed Methods for policy research and program evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Byrne, D. (2016). Qualitative comparative analysis: a pragmatic method for evaluating intervention. Surrey: Centre for the Evaluation Complexity Across the Nexus. Casillas, C., García, L. & Macía, M. (2020). Guía de evaluabilidad de intervenciones públicas. Madrid: Ministerio de Política Territorial y Función Pública. Casillas, C., García, L., Lago, E. & Macía, M. (2020). Guía de evaluación de implementación de políticas públicas. Madrid: Ministerio de Política Territorial y Función Pública. Casillas, C., Macía, M. & Rico, J. (2020). Guía de evaluación de diseño de políticas públicas. Madrid: Ministerio de Política Territorial y Función Pública. Chan, K., Nguyen, T. & Tran, T. (2018). Developing cross-cultural measurement in social work research and evaluation. (2nd. Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chiappini, H. (2017). Social impact funds: definition, assessment and performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Chouinard, J. & Cram, F. (2019). Culturally responsive approaches to evaluation: empirical implications for theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Chyung, S. (2018). 10-Step Evaluation for Training and Performance Improvement. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Cousins, J. (2019). Collaborative approaches to evaluation: principles in use. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Debu, S. (2019). L?évaluation des politiques publiques au Royaume-Uni. Document de travail n.º 14. France Stratégie. Desplatz, R. & Ferracci, M. (2016). Comment évaluer l?impactdes politiques publiques? Un guide à l?usagedes décideurs et praticiens. France Stratégie. Desplatz, R. & Lacouette-Fougère, C. (2019). L?évaluation des politiques publiques en France. Document de travail n.º 13. France Stratégie. Desplatz, R. (2019). L?évaluation des politiques publiques eaux États-Unis. Document de travail n.º 12. France Stratégie. Donaldson, S., Christie, C. & Mark, M. (2015). Credible and actionable evidence: the foundation for rigorous and influential evaluations. (2nd. Ed.) Thousand Oaks: Sage. Duffy, D. (2017). Evaluation and governing in the 21st century: disciplinary measures, transformative possibilities. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. European Commission (2018). Programming period 2014-2020: Monitoring and evaluation of European Cohesion Policy. August 2018. European Commission. European Commission (2019). Advanced counterfactual evaluation methods: Guidance document. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. European Commission (2020). How to use administrative data for European Social Funds counterfactual impact evaluations. A step-by-step guide for managing authorities. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Ferrão, J. & Paixão, J. (eds.) (2018). Metodologias de avaliação de políticas públicas. Lisboa: Imprensa da Universidade de Lisboa. Fink, A. (2015). Evaluation fundamentals: insights into program effectiveness, quality and value. (3th. Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Fröhlich, M. &; Sperlich, S. (2019). Impact evaluation, treatment effects and causal analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gertler, P., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. & Vermeersch, C. (2018). Avaliação de Impacto na Prática. (2th. Ed.) Washington: World Bank Publications. Hardy, A., Preiser, W. & Schramm, U. (2017). Building performance evaluation: from delivery process to life cycle phases. (2nd. Ed.). Cham: Springer International Publishing. HM Treasury (2018). The green book central government guidance on appraisal and evaluation. London: Crown Copyright. HM Treasury (2020). Magenta book: guidance for evaluation. London: Crown Copyright. Josselin, J. & Maux, B. (2017). Statistical tools for program evaluation methods and applications to economic policy, public health, and education. Cham: Springer. Kenneth J. & Posavac, E. (2018). Program evaluation: methods and case studies. (9th. Ed.). London: Routledge. Markiewicz, A. & Patrick, I. (2015). Developing monitoring and evaluation frameworks. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Mcdavid, J., Huse, I. & Hawyhorn, L (2019). Program evaluation and performance measurement. An introduction to practice. (3th. Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. McKegg, K., Patton, M. & Wehipeihana, N. (2016). Developmental evaluation exemplars: principles in practice. New York: The Guilford Press. Mertens, D. & Wilson, A. (2018). Program evaluation theory and practice: a comprehensive guide. (2nd. En.) New York: The Guilford Press. Mertens, D. (2018). Mixed Methods design in evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Monteros, J. (2017). Guía de evaluación ex ante de políticas públicas. Sevilla: Instituto Andaluz de Administración Pública. Nkwake, A. (2015). Credibility, validity, and assumptions in program evaluation methodology. Cham: Springer. Nkwake, A. (2020). Working with assumptions in international development program evaluation. (2nd. Ed.). Cham: Springer Nature. OECD/DAC (2019). Better criteria for better evaluation. Revised evaluation criteria definitions and principles for use. Paris: OECD DAC Network on Development Evaluation. Padia, E. (2019). Bases para la evaluación de impacto de políticas públicas. Sevilla: Instituto Andaluz de Administración Pública. Pasanen, T. & Shaxson, L. (2016). How to design a monitoring and evaluation framework for a policy research project. London: Methods Lab. Patton, M. (2017). Principles-focused evaluation: the guide. New York: The Guilford Press. Patton, M., McKegg, K & Wehipeihana, N. (2016). Developmental evaluation exemplars. New York: The Guilford Press. Peck, L. (2019). Experimental evaluation design for program improvement (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Perret, B. (2016). L?evaluation des politiques publiques. Paris: La Découverte. Posavac, E. & Linfield, K. (2018). Program evaluation: methods and case studies. (9th. Ed.). London. Routledge. Preskill, H. & Russ-Eft, D. (2016). Building evaluation capacity. (2nd. Ed.) London: Sage. Rico, J. (2020). Guía de evaluación de resultados de políticas públicas. Madrid: Ministerio de Política Territorial y Función Pública. Ruiz, A. (coord.) (2015). Guía práctica para el diseño y la realización de evaluaciones de políticas públicas. Madrid: Agencia Estatal de Evaluación de las Políticas Públicas y la Calidad de los Servicios. Ruiz, C. (2016). Guía para el diseño, gestión y utilización de evaluaciones de programas y políticas públicas. Documento de Trabajo nº 45. Madrid: Programa EUROsociAL. Saunders, R. (2016). Implementation monitoring and process evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Schmid, C., Stijnen, T. & White, I. (eds.) (2021). Handbook of meta-analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Scupola, A. (2019). Digital transformation of public administration services in Denmark: a process tracing case study. In Journal of NBICT, Vol. 1, 261-284. Shah, A. (2020). Policy, program and project evaluation: a toolkit for economic analysis in a changing world. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Stockmann, R. & Meyer, W. (eds.) (2016). The future of evaluation: global trends, new challenges, shared perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Stufflebeam, D. & Shinfield, A. (2014). Evaluation theory, models and applications. (2nd. Ed.). London: Wiley and Sons. Torralbo, R. & Roldán, S. (2019). A evaluación de políticas públicas con enfoque de género. Sevilla: Instituto Andaluz de Administración Pública. Trevisan, M. & Walser, T. (2015). Evaluation assessment: improving evaluation quality and use. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Wauters, B. (2018). Process tracing and congruence analysis to support theory-based impact evaluation. In Evaluation, 24(3), pp. 284-305. Westhorp, G. (2014). Realist impact evaluation: an introduction. London: Overseas Development Institute. White, H. & Raitzer, D. (2017). Impact evaluation of development interventions. Manila: Asian Development Bank. Wholey, J., Harty, H. & Newcomer, K. (eds.) (2015). Handbook of practical program evaluation. (4th. Ed.). Washington: Jossey-Bass. Planeamento de Políticas Públicas Allison, M. & Kaye, J. (2015). Strategic planning for nonprofit organizations: a practical guide for dynamic times. (3th. Ed.). Hoboken: Wiley. Altschuld, J. & Eastmond, J. (2010). Needs assessment: getting started (Phase I). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Altschuld, J. & Kumar, D. (2010). Needs assessment: an overview. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Altschuld, J. & White, J. (2010). Needs assessment: analysis and prioritization. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Altschuld, J. (2010). Needs assessment: collecting data (Phase II). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Andersen, L., Boesen, A. & Pedersen, L. (2016). Performance in public organizations: clarifying the conceptual space. Public Administration Review 76(6): 852?62. Anderson, D. (2019). Organization design: creating strategic & agile organizations. Los Angeles: Sage. Anderson, J. (2015). Public policymaking: an introduction. (8nd. Ed.). Stanford: Cengage Learning. Andrews, R., Boyne, G., Law, J. & Walker, R. (2012). Strategic management and public service performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Armijo, M. (2011). Planificación estratégica e indicadores de desempeño en el sector público. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL/Naciones Unidas. Baehler, K., Besharov, D. & Klerman, J. (2017). Improving public services: international experiences in using evaluation tools to measure program performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bardach, E. & Patashnik, E. (2020). A practical guide for policy analysis: the eightfold path to more effective problem solving. (6nd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage/ CQ Press. Barrilleaux, C., Reenock, C. &Souva, M. (2017). Democratic policymaking: an analytic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bason, C. (2017). Leading public design. Bristol: Policy Press. Baumgartner, R., Breunig, C. & Grossmann, E. (2019). Comparative policy agendas: theory, tools, data. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Berg-Schlosser, D., Badie, B & Morlino, F. (eds.) (2020). The SAGE handbook of political science. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Besharov, D., Baehler, K. & Klerman, J. (2017). Improving public services: international experiences in using evaluation tools to measure program performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Birkland, T. (2016). An introduction to the policy process: theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. (4nd. Ed.). New York: Routledge. Boardman, A., Greenberg, D., Vining, A. & Weimer, D. (2018). Cost-benefit analysis: concepts and practice. (5th. Rd.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Bojeun, M. (2013). Program management leadership: creating successful team dynamics. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Brooks, M. (2002). Planning theory for practitioners. Chicago: American Planning Association. Bryson, J. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organization. (5nd. Ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Caramani, D. (2017). Comparative politics. (4th Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cardoso, j. & Cunha, A. (org.) (2015). Planejamento e avaliação de políticas públicas. Brasília: IPEA. Casillas, C., Macía, M. & Rico, J. (2020). Guía de evaluación de diseño de políticas públicas. Madrid: Ministerio de Política Territorial y Función Pública. Cerezo, L. & Prieto, A. (2010). Manual de planificación, monitoreo y evaluación. Buenos Aires: Programa REMEDIAR + Redes/Ministerio de Salud de la Nación. Colebatch, H. & Hoppe, R. (eds.) (2018). Handbook on policy process and governing. Cheltenham: Edward Elga. Coletti, P. (2013). Evidence for public policy design: how to learn from best practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Colino, C. & Pino, E. (2016). Guía metodológica para el desarrollo de procesos de planificación de políticas públicas en el ámbito sectorial. Madrid: Agencia Estatal de Evaluación de las Políticas Públicas y la Calidad de los Servicios. Drumaux, A. & Joyce, p. (2018). Strategic management for public governance in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Dunn, W. (2018). Public policy analysis: an integrated approach. (6nd. Ed.). London: Routledge. Dye, T. (2017). Understanding Public Policy. (15th. Ed.). Boston: Pearson. Eichhorn, P. & Towers, I. (2018). Principles of management: efficiency and effectiveness in the private and public sector. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Farazmand, A. (eds.) (2018). Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Boca Raton: Springer Fontaine. G. (2015). El análisis de políticas públicas: conceptos teórias y métodos. México: Siglo XXI Editores. Frenchtling, J. (2007). Logic modeling methods in program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Friedman, L. (2018). Does policy analysis matter? Exploring its effectiveness in theory and practice. Oakland: University of California Press. Funnell, S. & Rogers, P. (2011). Purposeful program theory: effective use of theories of change and logic models. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Gerston, L. (2010). Public policy making: process and principles. (3th. Ed.). London: Routledge. Guerra, I. (2007). Fundamentos e processos de uma sociologia de acção: o planeamento em ciências sociais. (2nd. Ed.). Cascais: Princípia. Harguindéguy, J. (2013). Análises de políticas públicas. Madrid: tecnos. Henríquez, O. & Morales, M. (cord.) (2009). Guía metodológica para la formulación de políticas públicas regionales. Santiago de Chile: Departamento de Políticas y Descentralización, Subsecretaría de Desarrollo Regional y Administrativo del Gobierno de Chile. Hill, m. & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing public policy: an introduction to the study of operational governance. (3rd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Hill, M. (2012). The public policy process. (6th. Ed.).London: Pearson/Longman. Hislope, R. & Mughan, A. (2012). Introduction to comparative politics: the state and its challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Howlett, M., Ramesh, M & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. (3th. Ed.) Oxford: OUP. Immordino, K. (2014). Organizational assessment and improvement in the public sector workbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Innes, J., & Booher, D. (2018). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. Issel, L. & Wells, R. (2018). Health program planning and evaluation: a practical, systematic approach for community health. Burlington: Jones & Bartlett Learning Joyce, P. & Drumaux, A. (Eds.) (2014), Strategic management in public organizations: European practices and perspectives. New York: Routledge. Joyce, P. (2015). Strategic management in the public sector. Abingdon: Routledge. Kettl, D. (2018). Politics of the administrative process. (7rd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Khan, M. (2015). Program governance. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Knowlton, L. & Phillips, C. (2012). The logic model guidebook. (2nd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Kraft, M. & Furlong, S. (2020). Public policy: politics, analysis, and alternatives. (7th. Ed.) Los Angeles: CQ Press. Kwak, Y., Liu, M. & Zwikael, O. (2014). Challenges and best practices of managing government projects and programs. Newtown Square: Project Management Institute. Manski, C. (2013). Public policy in an uncertain World: analysis and decisions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. McCormick, J., Hague, R. & Harrop, M. (2019). Comparative government and politics: an introduction. (11th. Ed.). London: Red Globe Press. McDavid, J., Huse, I., & Hawthorn, L. (2018). Program evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice (3nd. ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Menchén, M., Caro, C. & Gil, A. (2020). Guía para el diseño de estudios piloto de políticas públicas. Sevilla: Instituto Andaluz de Administración Pública. Monsen, K. (2017). Intervention effectiveness research: quality improvement and program evaluation. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Murphy, P., Ferry, L., Glennon, R. &, Greenhalgh, K. (2019). Public service accountability: rekindling a debate. Cham: Palgrave/Macmillan. Pallavicini, V., Chamizo, H. & Vargas, J. (2013). Manual de formulación de políticas públicas. San José: Fondo de Población de las Naciones Unidas. Parkhurst, J. (2017). The politics of evidence: from evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence. New York: Routledge. Pasanen, T. & Shaxson, L. (2016). How to design a monitoring and evaluation framework for a policy research project. London: Methods Lab. Patton, C., Sawicki, D. & Clark, J. (2012). Basic methods of policy analysis and planning. New York: Routledge. Poister, T., Aristigueta, M. & Jeremy, L. (2015). Managing and measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations: an integrated approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Pollock III, P. (2019). The essentials of political analysis. (6nd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage/ CQ Press. Project Management Institute (2017). The standard for program management. (4nd. Ed.). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute. Reeves, D. (2005). Planning for diversity. Policy and planning in a world of difference. Abingdon: Routledge. Rodrigues, M. & Carreiras, H. (eds.) (2017). Exercícios de análise de políticas públicas. Lisboa: Editora Mundos Sociais. Sabatier, P. (eds.) (2019). Theories of the policy process. London: Routledge. Sandfort, J. & Moulton, S. (2014). Effective implementation in practice: integrating public policy and management. San Francisco: Wiley. Shambaugh IV, G. & Weinstein, P. (2016). The art of policymaking; tools, techniques and processes in the modern executive branch. (2nd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks: CQ Press. Shapiro, S. (2016). Analysis and public policy: successes, failures and directions for reform. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Silva, E., Healey, P., Harris, H. & Broeck, P. (2014). The Routledge handbook of planning research methods. New York: Routledge. Thissen, W. & Walker, W. (eds.) (2013). Public policy analysis: new developments. New York: Springer. UNICEF (2017). Manual sobre la gestión basada en resultados: la labor conjunta en favor de la niñez. Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la Infancia. United Nations Development Group. (2011). Results-based management handbook: harmonizing RBM concepts and approaches for improved development results at country level. United Nations Development Group. United Nations Development Programme (2009). Handbook on planning, monitoring and evaluating for development results. New York: United Nations Development Programme. Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance management in the public sector. (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. Vining, A. & Weimer, D. (2016). Policy analysis: concepts and practice. (5nd. Ed.). London: Routledge. Vries, M., Nemec, J. & ?pa?ek, D. (2019). Performance-based budgeting in the public sector. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Wu, X., Ramesh, M., Howlett, M. & Fritzen, S. (2014). Guia de políticas públicas: gerenciando processos. Brasília: ENAP. Zittoun, Philippe (2014). The political process of policymaking: a pragmatic approach to public policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. "
Data da última atualização / Last Update Date
2024-02-16