Bibliografia

Principal

Accornero, Guya and Olivier Fillieule. 2016. ‘Introduction “So many as the stars of the sky in multitude, and as the sand which is by the sea shore innumerable”: European Social Movement Research in Perspective’. In Social Movements in Europe. The State of the Art, ed. by Olivier Fillieule and Guya Accornero, New York-London: Berghahn, pp. 1-18 Accornero, Guya. 2017. ‘The ‘Mediation’ of the Portuguese Anti-Austerity Protest Cycle. Media Coverage and its Impact’, in Media Representations of Anti-Austerity Protests in the EU: Grievances, Identities and Agency, ed. by Tao Papaioannou and Suman Gupta. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 165-188 Beraldo, D., & Milan, S. (2019). From data politics to the contentious politics of data. Big Data & Society, 6(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719885967 Brooker, Philip et al. 2018. ‘Researching with Twitter timeline data: A demonstration via ‘‘everyday’’ sociopolitical talk around welfare provision’, Big Data & Society 1–13:

Secundária

Accornero, Guya and Pedro Ramos Pinto. 2015. ‘Mild Mannered’? Protest and Mobilisation in Portugal in Times of Crisis’, West European Politics 38(3): 491-515 Accornero, Guya and Pedro Ramos Pinto. 2020. ‘Politics in austerity: Strategic interactions between social movements and institutional actors in Portugal, 2010–2015’. In Political Representation and Citizenship in Portugal From Crisis to Renewal, ed. by Marco Lisi, André Freire, Emmanouil Tsatsanis. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 45–69 Accornero, Guya and Tiago Carvalho. Forthcoming. ‘Social movements and political representation’. In Elgar Encyclopedia of Political Representation, ed. by André Freire, Eva Önnudóttir, Andrea Pedrazzanni, and Hermann Schmitt. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Adut, Ari. 2012. ‘A Theory of the Public Sphere’, Sociological Theory 30(4) 238–262 Ardıç, Nurullah. 2012. ‘Understanding the 'Arab Spring': Justice, Dignity, Religion and International Politics’, Afro Eurasian Studies 1(1): 8-52 Aslandis, Paris. 2017. ‘Populism and Social Movements’. In Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. by Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser et al. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Baiocchi, Gianpaolo. 2001. ‘Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory’, Politics and Society 29(1): 43-72. Beraldo, D. (2020). Dividing by zero. Tautology and paradox in the self-descriptions of anonymous. Journal of Sociocybernetics, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_jos/jos.202014246 Bettega, Mela. Forthcoming. ‘The Common-gradients: reflecting on the non-neutrality of digital tools activists' use and exploring possible alternatives’. In Ativismo, participação and cidadania digital, ed. by Juliana Rodrigues, José Alberto Vasconcelos Simões and Ricardo Campos. Lisboa: CICS.NOVA/Húmus Bosi, Lorenzo, Marco Giugni and Katrin Uba. 2016. The consequence of social movements. Cambridge University Press Cardoso, Gustavo, Guya Accornero, Tiago Lapa and Joana Azevedo. 2017. ‘Social Movements, participation and crisis in Europe’, in Europe’s crisis, ed. by Manuel Castells, Olivier Bouin, Joao Caraca, Gustavo Cardoso, John Thompson and Michel Wieviorka. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 405-427 Charnock, Greig, Hug March, and Ramon Ribera-Fumaz. 2019. ‘From smart to rebel city? Worlding, provincialising and the Barcelona Model’, Urban Studies 58(3): 581-600. Choi, Moonsun 2016.’ A Concept Analysis of Digital Citizenship for Democratic Citizenship Education in the Internet Age’, Theory & Research in Social Education 44(4): 565-607. De Blasio, Emiliana, and Michele Sorice. 2018. ‘Populism between direct democracy and the technological myth’, Palgrave Communication 4(15): 1-11. della Porta, Donatella, and Mario Diani. 1998. Social Movements: An introduction. Oxford : Blackwell Publishers Della Porta, Donatella. 2014. ‘Social Movement Studies and Methodological Pluralism: An Introduction. In Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, ed. by Donatella della Porta. Oxford University Press della Porta, Donatella. 2020. How Social Movements Can Save Democracy: Democratic Innovations from Below. Cambridge: Polity Press. Dencik, Lina, Arne Hintz, and Zoe Carey. 2018. Prediction, pre-emption and limits to dissent: Social media and big data uses for policing protests in the United Kingdom’, New Media & Society 20 (4): 1433–1450 Doerr, Nicole. 2018. Political Translation. How Social Movement Democracies Survive. Cambridge: Cambridge UP Drake, Anna, 2021. Activism, Inclusion, and the Challenges of Deliberative Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Falanga, Roberto, and Ligia Lüchmann. 2020. ‘Participatory Budgets in Brazil and Portugal: Comparing Patterns of Dissemination’, Policy Studies 41(6): 603-622. Felicetti, Andrea and Markus Holdo. 2023. ‘Reflective Inclusion: Learning from Activists What Taking a Deliberative Stance Means’, Political Studies, https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221150867 Ferguson, A. G. (2017). The rise of big data policing: Surveillance, race, and the future of law enforcement. New York University Press Fernandes, Tiago. 2018. ‘Organizational Sources of Social Resilience and Progressive Governance: Portugal during and after Austerity (2008-2015)’. In Inequality in the Portuguese-Speaking World, ed. by Francisco Bethencourt, Eastbourne: Sussex Academic Press Fillieule, Olivier, and Guya Accornero. 2016. Social Movement Studies in Europe. The State of the Art. Oxford/New York. Fishman, Robert. 2019. Democratic Practice. Origins of the Iberian Divide in Political Inclusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Flesher Fominaya, C. (2014), ‘Debunking Spontaneity: Spain's 15-M/Indignados as Autonomous Movement’, Social Movement Studies 14(2): 142-163 Fominaya, Cristina Flesher. 2022. ‘Reconceptualizing Democratic Innovation’, Democratic Theory Volume 9(2): 78–100 Gerbaudo, Paolo. 2018. ‘Social media and populism: an elective affinity?’, Media, Culture & Society 40(5): 745-753. Goldstone, Jack A., 2004. ‘More Social Movements or Fewer? Beyond Political Opportunity Structures to Relational Fields’, Theory and Society 33(3-4), pp. 333-365. Habermas, Jurgen 1994. ‘Three normative models of democracy’ Democratic and constitutional theory today 1(1): 1-10 Joyce, Mart (ed). 2010. Digital Activism Decoded. The New Mechanics of Change. NYC: International Debate Education Association. Klein, Adam. 2015. ‘Vigilante Media: Unveiling Anonymous and the Hacktivist Persona in the Global Press’, Communication Monographs 82(3): 379-401 Koopmans, Ruud. 2004. ‘Movements and media: selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere’, Theory and Society 33(3): 367–91. Kriesi, Hanspeter and Takkis Papas. 2015. Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession, Colchester: ECPR Press Lane, Jeffrey. 2016. ‘The Digital Street: an Ethnographic Study of Networked Street Life in Harlem’, American Behavioral Scientist 60(1): 43-58 Lee, Francis. 2018. ‘Internet alternative media, movement experience, and radicalism: the case of post-Umbrella Movement Hong Kong’, Social Movement Studies 17(2): 219-233 McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. McDonald, Kevin. 2015. ‘From Indymedia to Anonymous: rethinking action and identity in digital cultures’, Information, Communication & Society 18(8): 968-928. McIlwain, C. 2020. Black Software. The Internet & Racial Justice, from the AfroNet to Black Lives Matter. Oxford: Oxford University Press Milan, Stefania, and Davide, Beraldo. 2024. ‘Data in movement: the social movement society in the age of datafication’, Social Movement Studies 23(3), 265–284. Milan, Stefania, and Lonneke van der Velden. 2018. ‘The Alternative Epistemologies of Data Activism’, Digital Culture and Society 2(2): 58-74. Mosca, Lorenzo. 2014. ‘Methodological Practices in Social Movement Online Research’. In Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, ed. by Donatella della Porta. Oxford University Press, pp. 398-417 Müller, Jan-Werner. 2017. What is Populism?. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press Nitin Govil, and Anirban Kapil Baishya. 2018. ‘The Bully in the Pulpit: Autocracy, Digital Social Media, and Right-wing Populist Technoculture’, Communication Culture & Critique 11: 67-84. Norris, Pippa. 2002. Democratic Phoenix. Reinventing Political Activism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Owen, Stephen. 2017. ‘Monitoring social media and protest movements: ensuring political order through surveillance and surveillance discourse’, Social Identities Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture 23(6): 688-700. Pink, Sarah et al (eds.). 2016. Digital Ethnography. Principles and Practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Poell, Thomas. 2019. ‘Social media, temporality, and the legitimacy of protest’, Social Movement Studies 5(19): 609-624 Rodima-Taylor, Daivi. 2024. ‘Grassroots Data Activism and Polycentric Governance. Perspectives from the Margins’, in Global Digital Data Governance Polycentric Perspectives, ed. by Carolina Aguerre, Malcolm Campbell-Verduyn, Jan Aart Scholte. Abingdon: Routledge. Romanos, Eduardo, and Igor Sádaba. 2016. ‘From the Street to Institutions Through the App: Digitally Enabled Political Outcomes of the Spanish Indignados Movement’, Revista Internacional de Sociología 74(4): e048. Schäfer, Mike. 2015. ‘Digital Public Sphere’, in The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, ed. by Gianpietro Mazzoleni et al. London: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 322-328. Schroeder, Ralph 2018. ‘Digital media and the rise of right-wing populism’, in Social Theory after the Internet. Media, Technology, and Globalization. London: UCL Press, pp. 60-81 (full book available here: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10040801/1/Social-Theory-after-the-Internet.pdf) Smith, Adrian, and Pedro Prieto Martín. 2021. ‘Going Beyond the Smart City? Implementing Technopolitical Platforms for Urban Democracy in Madrid and Barcelona’, Journal of Urban Technology 28(1-2): 311-330 Souza, Celina. 2000. ‘Participatory Budgeting in Brazilian Cities: Limits and Possibilities in Building Democratic Institutions’, Environment and Urbanization 13(1): 159-184 Tarrow, Sidney. 1989. Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy, 1965-1975. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tarrow, Sidney. 2011. Power in Movement. Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tejerina, Benjamin et al. (eds.) 2013. ‘From indignation to occupation: a new wave of global mobilization’, special issue in Current Sociology 61(4) Tremayne, Mark. 2014. ‘Anatomy of Protest in the Digital Era: A Network Analysis of Twitter and Occupy Wall Street’, Social Movement Studies 13(1): 110-126. Vicari, Stefania. 2013. ‘Public reasoning around social contention: A case study of Twitter use in the Italian mobilization for global change’, Current Sociology 61(4) 474–490 Vliegenthart, Rens, and Stefaan Walgrave. 2012. ‘The interdependency of mass media and social movements’. In The SAGE handbook of political communication, ed. by Semetko, H. and Scammell, M. London: Sage, pp. 387–98 Waisbord, Silvio and Adriana Amado. 2017. ‘Populist communication by digital means: presidential Twitter in Latin America’, Information, Communication & Society 20(9): 1330-1346. Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.: