Bibliografia

Principal

• Wallerstein, I., Juma, C., Keller, E.F., et al. (1996). Para abrir as ciências sociais- Relatório da Comissão Gulbenkian sobre a reestruturação das ciências sociais. Lisboa: Europa-América Tweney, R.D., Doherty, M.E. & Mynatt C.R. (1980) (Eds). On Scientific Thinking. New York: Columbia U. Press Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton U. Press the crisis? European J. of Social Psychology, 19, 339-344 Rijsman, J. & Stroebe, W. (1989).The two social psychologies or whatever happened to Patterson, M. & Williams, D. (2005). Maintaining research traditions on place: diversity of thought and scientific progress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 361-380 Popper, K. (1978). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Kuhn, T.S. (1962/70). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: U.Chicago Press Bowell, T. & Kemp, G. (2005). Critical thinking - A concise guide. London: Routledge :

Secundária

• Wallerstein, I., Juma, C., Keller, E.F., Kocka, J., Lecourt, D., Mudimbe, V, Mushakoji, K., Prigogine, I., Taylor, P, Trouillot, M-R. (1996). Para abrir as ciências sociais - relatório da Comissão Gulbenkian sobre a reestruturação das ciências sociais. Lisboa: Publicações Europa-América. Rizzoli, V, Castro, P., Tuzzi, A. & Contarello, A. (2018). Probing the history of social psychology, exploring diversity and views of the social: Publication trends in the European Journal of Social Psychology from 1971 to 2016. European Journal of Social Psychology. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2528 the crisis?», in European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, pp. 339-344. Rijsman, J. & Stroebe, W. (1989), «The two social psychologies or whatever happened to Pinch, T.J. (1997). Kuhn - The conservative and radical interpretations: are some Mertonians "Kuhnians" and some Kuhnians "Mertonians"? Social Studies of Science, 27, 465-482. Perelman, C. (1977/93). O império retórico: retórica e argumentação. Lisboa: Edições Asa. Patterson, M.E. & Williams, D.R. (2005). Maintaining research traditions on place: diversity of thought and scientific progress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 361-380. Meltzoff, J. (1998). Critical thinking about research: psychology and related Fields. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Newton, I. (1687). The rules of hypothesising. In R.D. Tweney, M.E. Doherty, & C.R. Mynatt (Eds.). On Scientific Thinking (1980). New York: Columbia University Press. Kuhn, T.S. (2003). On scientific paradigms. In M.Gergen & K. Gergen (Eds). Social construction: a reader. London: Sage publications. Jovchelovitch, S. (2006). Knowledge in context: representations, community and culture. London: Routledge. Habermas, J. (2010). Obras Escolhidas (vol. I): Fundamentação Linguística da Sociologia. Lisboa: Edições 70. Harré, R. (1997). The man who finished of authority. In Obituary - Thomas S. Kuhn. Social Studies of Science, 27, 484-486. Gergen, K.J. (1994). The limits of pure critique. In H.W. Simmons & M. Billig (Eds.) After Postmodernism: reconstructing ideology critique (pp. 58-78). London: Sage Publications. Fuller, S. (1997). Confessions of a recovering kuhnian. In Obituary - Thomas S. Kuhn. Social Studies of Science, 27, 492-494. Castro, P. (1995). Contributos para uma comparação crítica de três tradições em Psicologia Social: atitudes, representações sociais e cognição social. Psicologia, X, 155-174. Bruner, J. (2000). Making stories: law, literature, life. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Social Inquiry, 18, 1-21. Álvaro, J.L. & Garrido, A. (2006). Psicologia social. Perspectivas psicológicas e sociológicas. São Paulo: McGraw Hill. :