Currículo

Psicologia Social da Justiça M8210

Contextos

ECTS

6.0 (para cálculo da média)

Objectivos

Esta UC visa oferecer o quadro teórico para a intervenção psicossocial nas questões relacionadas com as percepções de justiça. Pretende-se, assim, que os alunos saibam utilizar os modelos teóricos da Psicologia Social da Justiça na resolução de problemas e conflitos sociais e organizacionais. O aluno que complete com sucesso esta Unidade Curricular será capaz de: OA1. Descrever e contrastar teorias sobre psicologia social da justiça. OA2. Descrever os antecedentes e consequentes dos julgamentos de justiça e aplicá-los a situações concretas. OA3. Identificar estratégias de intervenção de promoção da justiça social e organizacional.

Programa

CP1. A Psicologia Social da Justiça: definição e âmbito de aplicação. CP2. Teorias da privação relativa, CP3. Teorias da justiça distributiva, CP4. Teorias da justiça procedimental /interaccional. CP5. Teorias da justiça retributiva. CP6. A teoria da crença no mundo justo e as reacções às vítimas de injustiça. CP7. Teorias da justiça restaurativa.

Método de Avaliação

Os alunos podem frequentar esta UC em regime de avaliação periódica ou de exame final. Para realizar a avaliação periódica, os alunos deverão: - realizar um trabalho (35%); - Realizar uma frequência individual (65%). Os alunos que não tenham realizado a avaliação periódica ou que tenham ficado reprovados na mesma (nota inferior a 10 valores), poderão apresentar-se a exame final (100%).

Carga Horária

Bibliografia

Principal

• Cropanzano, R., & Ambrose, M. A. (2015). (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Johnstone, G., & Van Ness, D.W. (2007). The handbook of restorative justice. Devon: Willan Publishing. Jost, J.T., & Kay, A.C. (2010). Social justice: History, theory, and research. In S.T. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th edition, Vol. 2, pp. 1122-1165). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Sutton, R. & Douglas K. (2013). Social psychology. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Tyler, T., Boeckman, R.J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y.J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Colorado: Westview Press:

Secundária

• Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Abrams, L. S., Umbreit, M., & Gordon, A. (2006). Young offenders speak about meeting their victims: Implications for future programs. Contemporary Justice Review, 9, 243-256. Bazemore, G. & Schiff, M. (2001). Understanding restorative community justice: What and why now? In G. Bazemore, & M. Schiff (Eds.), Restorative justice: Repairing harm and transforming communities (pp. 21-46). Cincinnati, Anderson. Bobocel, D. R., Kay, A. C., Zanna, M. P., & Olson, J. M. (Eds.) (2010) The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 11). New York: Psychology Press. Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1-16. Cohen, R. L. (2001). Provocations of restorative justice. Social Justice Research, 14, 209-232. Colquitt, J. A. (2008). Two decades of organizational justice: Findings, controversies, and future directions. In C. L. Cooper & J. Barling (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational behavior: Volume 1 - Micro Approaches (pp. 73-88). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Colquitt, J. A. (2012). Organizational justice. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 526-547). New York: Oxford University Press. Correia, I. F. (2000). A teoria da crença no mundo justo e a vitimização secundária: Estudos empíricos e desenvolvimentos teóricos. Psicologia, 14, 253-283. Correia, I. F. (2003). Concertos e desconcertos na procura de um mundo concertado. Lisboa: FCG/FCT. Correia, I. (2010). Psicologia Social da Justiça: Fundamentos e desenvolvimentos teóricos e empíricos. Análise Psicológica, 28, 7-28. Correia, I., Alves, H., Morais, R., & Ramos, M. (2015). The legitimation of wife abuse among women: The impact of belief in a just world and gender identification. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 7-12. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.041 Correia, I., & Dalbert, C. (2008). School Bullying: Belief in a Personal Just World of Bullies, Victims and Defenders. European Psychologist, 13, 248-254. DOI 10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.248 Correia, I., & Dalbert, C. (2007). Belief in a just world, justice concerns, and well-being at portuguese schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 421-437. Correia, I., Salvado, S., & Alves, H. (2016). Belief in a just world and self-efficacy to promote justice in the world predict helping attitudes, but only among volunteers. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, e28, 1-9. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.29 Correia, I., Vala, J., & Aguiar, P. (2007). Victims innocence, social categorization and the threat to the belief in a just world. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 31-38. Crosby, F. J. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371-386. Crosby, F.J., Iyer, A., Clayton, S., & Downing, R. A. (2003). Affirmative action. Psychological data and the policy debates. American Psychologist, 58, 93-115. Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. Darley, J., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324-336. De Cremer, D. (2007). Advances in the psychology of justice and affect. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Diekmann, K. A., Walker, S. D. S., Galinsky, A. D., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2013). Double victimization in the workplace: Why observers condemn passive victims of sexual harassment. Organization Science, 24(2), 614-628. García-Sánchez, E., Van der Toorn, J., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Willis, G. B. (2019). The vicious cycle of economic inequality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 194855061881150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618811500 Gouveia-Pereira, M., Vala, J., & Correia, I. (2017). Teachers' legitimacy: Effects of justice perception and social comparison processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 1-15. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12131 Gouveia-Pereira, M., Vala, J., Palmonari, A., Rubini, M. (2003). School experience, relational justice and legitimation of institutional authorities. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 309-325. Hafer, C. L, & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128-167. Lerner, M. J. (1980). Belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation. Orth, U. (2002). Secondary victimization of crime victims by criminal proceedings. Social Justice Research, 15, 313- 325. Otto, K. & Dalbert, C. (2005). Belief in a just world and its functions for young prisoners. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 559-573. Peters, S. L., & van den Bos, K. (2008). When fairness is important: Reactions to being inequitably paid in communal relationships. Social Justice Research, 21, 86-105. Picket, K. E., & Wilkinson, RG. (2015). Income inequality and health: A causal review. Social Science and Medicine, 128, 316-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.031 Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Tyler, T. Degoey, P. & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2007). The problems of relative deprivation: Why some societies do better than others. Social Science & Medicine, 65(9), 1965?1978 Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2009a). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Penguin. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2009b). Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 493?512. Other specific papers will be recommended during the course.:

Disciplinas de Execução

2024/2025 - 1º Semestre

2023/2024 - 1º Semestre

2020/2021 - 1º Semestre

2021/2022 - 1º Semestre